It’s Complicated

This is a letter to my creativity coach Sara
Before our call I always give her a headsup.
.
Dear Sara,
.
I was there Gandalf.
I was there three thousand years ago when Isildur took the Ring.
I was there the day the strength of Men failed.
.

Elrond

And I promise that after a few thousand words this post will be tied to my love life .
I’ll mark the transition point with a heart ❤️  so you can skip!
Which is not just allowed, but probably recommended.

So for the brave ones;
Back to Elrond’s quote about Isildur not tossing the ring into the pit.

To this day people debate whether Elrond was simply dissing mankind here, when he recalled Isildur taking the ring for himself, instead of tossing it into the fires of Mount Doom;
Or if he was illustrating that even thousands of years ago, Men were not up to the job of rejecting the Ring.
And that those had been the times when Men was still honorable.
That Elrond was not so much angry or disappointed, but simply acknowledged that compared to Men, the power of the Ring was, and always had been, absolute.

In a similar way, I still struggle to classify the honorability of people but contrary to Elrond, my pain is felt in my love life.
Like hobbits focusing on their immediate surroundings, I too am very well capable of ignoring big world issues until ring ghosts stampeed the town looking for my uncle Bilbo.

And it suddenly becomes deeply personal.

But I digress!

Anyway, to bring it back to the Ring and my doubts about the nature of Men, my point was this.
I believe, this day and age, a certain ancient power structure akin to the ring should probably be tossed into the fires of Mount Doom for us all to be freed from it;

And yet, I also recognize we must never do that.
Ever.
That it would be a big mistake.

Our Ring, are social structures.
Big and small.
They’re not as innocent nor as constructive as they seem, but also, they are not the plain evil thing like The Ring is, in Lord of the Rings.

So, for context;

For as long as I can remember, I’ve been extremely suspicious of groups “for the sake of it”, meaning structures where the group itself and the identity or the belonging it provided was the goal.
But it took decades to unpack all the other places that were running on the exact same principle.

It’s like when you want to quit sugar, and find out it’s in almost everything you eat.
Social structures are in almost everything you live.

And I don’t have an alternative either!!
I recognize that the social structures we use and have, and the ones I myself still make use of, are at least for now, the best we can do.
The last thing I would advocate for is to dismantle social structures.
They are not a Ring only capable of doing evil.

The older I get, the more I recognize we definitely need social structures. Like, a lot. Somewhere at the level of food and water and a roof over our heads.
We cannot ask of Isildur or anybody else to throw our social structures into Mount Doom, because we definitely should not want them destroyed.

And yet? Still evil.

Back to my love life (no, no ❤️ yet, it’s till dry) where I still catch myself being disappointed when someone, understandably, chooses a relationship that matches their social structures, and can possibly even fortify it, or give them access to new opportunities.
To new networks, aka social structures.

A love relationship can turn you into a duo, a couple, doubling your resilience, no longer having to do everything alone.
Moving in together means you’re a family unit, in particular if you have pets or have children whether together or from previous relationships.
Then, in a full “romantic” partnership, there are the “expansion sets”: Extended Family, Befriended Couples and Friend Groups.

All to say: I get it.
I see it.
And I understand why singles feel they miss out on love, not just because they don’t have a romantic partner but because of that entire social structure that has “becoming partnered” as their entry level tier.

When I had my longterm relationships I, or the correct wording now is “We”, had many or all of those expansion sets and they were amazing.
I would say they were one of the best features of being partnered, and I had great relationships so that is saying something.

And yet, Sara!
STILL, I feel so disappointed for my love life being “inversely related”, the translation is according to Google to what it is I want to say here, to my refusal to provide any of those structures.
Meaning: the more clear I am, on never performing, providing or entering any of those structures again, the worse I feel about my love life.
To the point where I believe I was only ever chosen to perform socially.

Because I’ve ran simulations in my head on which men would still have said yes to having anything meaningful, if I had refused to deliver the social context or do the emotional labor that is for females an unspoken part of it.
My estimate is None.

None of the Men I have been involved with would have been willing and able, let alone eager and excited, to have a meaningful relationship with me, unless I performed socially.
Just an estimate, could be wrong, but that’s how I see it.

*inserts red heart*
❤️
Love life incoming

But have I ever told you exactly, and specifically, about how good that love life was?
How much fun, how fresh, and new, and honest?

And this was EVEN with men I never saw again, or whom I did not particularly like outside the bedroom (and they were probably not that into me either).
It was with those whom refused to discuss simple things like boundaries, expectations and intentions.
Every one of them made more impact than a whole fully booked holiday season of being comfortably imbedded in champagne, fireworks, Christmas sweaters and amazing dinners. 

So you can imagine how good it was, particularly in the bedroom, with the men I actually loved so much, I would have gone to hell and back for them.
Nothing short of spectacular.
Just gonna own it, at risk of coming across as arrogant or self-inflating, but just see it as a testimony that I, for one, had a really good time!
For me it was and is so clear that this is what life is all about, and what makes it all worth it.

And that’s the dichotomy.
That I understand why people choose their social structures, including the partnerships with all the expansion sets, over romantic connections who do not contribute there.
I totally get it, as I hope I was able to explain in all the boring paragraphs covering more than half of this blogpost.

Even if they love(d) me, and I can’t speak for them but even if they did or do;
I cannot ask you to choose me, knowing perfectly well this will cost you the world you live in.

And at the same time, despite all the nuance, and despite Gandalf and me and Reddit probably needing the rest of this century to figure this one out, I always seem to be ending on the same, terribly disheartening conclusion.

That it was the day when the strength of Men failed.

.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Subscribe to this blog for these letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.

The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/

I met The One, twice

It was on a Saturday, around lunch, and I still remember the friend on the other side of the table. It was the morning after the first night I slept with the man who would become my lover.
And I think I understood the significance of our connection, right then and there, over coffee with the friend.
As I told her about the amazing sex, and all the wooing that had preceded it.

Weeks and weeks of intoxicating flirting, warmth, play and challenge..
.
In how I talked about it, my friend detected a little hesitation to give it a label, status, or to express what I hoped would happen relationship-wise or something. As if I could control the situation by controlling the words I used to describe it.
She said: “That ship has sailed.”
I was fucked.
.
This post is a first attempt, to find out how to go about this new situation.
This new man.
Because I feel my policy to only value something if it is visible and present in the 3D, is no longer working here. And with regard to my feelings, just giving it time to pass has not worked. If anything, it has gotten worse.
And this is all after having multiple experiences with different men, all in recent years, where I could feel the interest in them come and go. I do know how very few connections actually survive.

 

But the man from the first paragraph?
My feelings never faded and even survived the breakup, still pristine. But I’m happy the affair ended, in the way Nikki Sixx is happy he quit heroin but still acknowledges it was the love of his life.
Nikki and me, we’ll will never find something that intoxicating again. But we’ll pass.

But other than him?
Time has devoured every connection I ever cried over, including my feelings for all whom I met in recent years.
All, except one.
Where time only seems to be making it “worse”.
Quotation marks because there is a chance that it already is exactly what it is meant to be.

Something 5D.
Something destined
Something that does not have words.
And yet includes all words that were ever spoken.

Something that cannot be ended, not by human hands, and that can therefor also never start.
Something where the ship took off the moment our eyes locked.

And we are unmistakably and inevitably, fucked.


.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Harteveld 2026*
Are 2200 characters, or less.
The series started in 2025, inspired by the book Fretz 2025 by Johan Fretz and asterisk from the movie Thunderbolts*

Subscribe to this blog for my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 project.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

My 2001 Ben Affleck Era | year 2001 behind the scenes

It’s a movie that confuses even YouTube.

Does it want to protect Chasing Amy’s rights, by displaying it at miniscule stamp-size, within an impossible to watch vertical frame and black and yellow danger zone stripes?
Which is what you will see if you try to watch Chasing Amy on your phone.

Or will it give the perfect wide frame?
Which is what you get if you watch in on desktop, although I don’t think that has been a word since 2001.

And why wouldn’t YouTube give us this entire 1997 Kevin Smith movie?
After all Chasing Amy is known for being perfectly capable of blowing up itself up, leaving viewers confused whether they just watched a daring piece of 90s cinema, or a most unwelcome homophobic movie.
It manages to polarize even 3 decades after.

Chasing Amy also manages to have me writing about it within 24 hours of rebooting my 2001 timeline.
{link to that post:  Desires of a time traveler part II | year 2001 behind the scenes 3 October 2026 }

After which I got to work living this 2001 timeline by watching the big 2001 movie Pearl Harbor, with Ben Affleck.

The sequence of things did get fuzzy after that!

All I know is that by the time the day was over, I had fallen deeply in love with Ben Affleck and had ran several analysis on how I had managed to miss him.
Most probable causes were I was already a fan of Brad Pitt which was pretty exclusive, and because one of the few occasions that barrier was broken it was by Jay and Silent Bob, who happened to appear alongside Ben Affleck , explaining why I may not have registered him because Jay and Silent Bob are in all of Ben Affleck’s 1990’s movies that were not Good Will Hunting.

By nighttime I had also created a 64 videos long chronologically ordered YouTube playlist with Ben Affleck videos, from which I regrettably removed Chasing Amy at 11 PM at night because it was unwatchable on my phone and I was unaware it would display perfectly the next day, on desktop. 

Like I said, it was a long day.

I promised myself I would make getting Chasing Amy on dvd a priority, because I had watched an entire skit presenting all Chasing Amy’s deleted scenes, as well as a 2026 in-depth review of Chasing Amy including how it had handled sensitive topics like bi- and homosexuality.
A video probably best described as a long love letter to Chasing Amy.
If the mixed tape was the love language of the 20th century, then making a YouTube analysis, in particular one this nuanced, is ours.

But even with those spin-off videos not being the real movie, something had started to shift.
A lot.
Everything affiliated to Chasing Amy was already so raw, interesting, enticing and alive, I felt a lost part of my sexuality returning immediately.
A part I had managed to put words to, yes (
link, for the thorough ones). I had managed to intellectually find it, but now I was actually feeling it.
It was back, and whatever it was it was as confusing as Chasing Amy itself. Probably because director and writer Kevin Smith had allowed himself to make a movie when he was still figuring all of it out.

The main character Holden, played by Ben Affleck, navigating the sexually conflicting 90s landscape, was a depiction of Kevin Smith himself.
And he basically screwed up.
Despite of what most of us will interpret as good intentions, it was not good enough to prevent him from losing the girl he loved.

Another scene where Kevin Smith plays Silent Bob who gives advice to Holden, that is Kevin Smith giving advice to his younger self.
It is what he wished he had known.

The movie Chasing Amy is Kevin Smith still figuring much of it out. It is, in a way, Kevin Smith taking the risk of getting it wrong again. 
And many will say he did, and perhaps they’re right.

But I felt a visceral aliveness that all the intellectualization of my sexuality never brought. And it didn’t come from seeing myself as bisexual, but it came from the undertone of repressed male homosexuality between the male characters, and in the deleted scenes video, even between the actors.
And how it resulted in being translated to banter, to denial, and sometimes to toxic situations.

Chasing Amy confirmed for me, that as cheeky and as cheap as I still think it sounds to say “I am a gay man in a woman’s body”;
It confirmed that at least for now, it is the most accurate description.

I recognized the dynamics between the men. Between Holden (Ben Affleck) and Banky. Between Silent Bob (Kevin Smith) and Jay.
And between me and every man I’ve been in a relationship with, long or short, and how although I often felt forced to play a feminine role, it was always cannibalizing on what really mattered.
It took away from the loud, joke-filled dynamics where nothing about love or romance was said and yet everything was felt.

Maybe Chasing Amy made me realize I am not doing timeline projects, for nothing. I am not teleporting myself back to the past, out of nostalgia or escapism. I really left something back there, that did not make it into the 21st century.

And Ben Affleck is there for me now, to give that timeline color. And I like the idea of reliving 2001 with a different idol. Ben Affleck, not Brad Pitt. 
And of integrating all those Kevin Smith movies, which he kept on making and although Ben Affleck and him stopped seeing each other for a decade or so, they too have found each other again.
And Ben Affleck reprised the role of Holden for Kevin Smith in 2019.

To close this post, I want to share a second revelation. Which is that I discovered Ben Affleck and me are almost the same age.
Born just weeks apart.

And now that I seem to be in an era where the men I fall in love with are so much younger, it feels good to once again have someone my own age facing me. Even if it is from a Pearl Harbor dvd playing on a Saturday afternoon, a recent interview where he talks about his personal life, or a stamp-sized Chasing Amy from 1997. 

I have a test, before I classify my feelings for someone as genuine, which I started doing to correct for the age-differences of a man being younger.
The test is: “Would I still have these feelings, if he was 70?”

It feels so strange, this notion of Ben Affleck having lived on this parallel timeline. Obviously I would not have to ask him that question, because he has the same age.
And I also live half a globe away, regardless if he lives in Hollywood or chose the East coast again.

But I can’t stop thinking about how weird it feels, that I never had these feelings for him before, despite seeing all those Kevin Smith movies at the time.
It wasn’t that I didn’t know who he was. But it’s like suddenly, this weekend, my eyes were opened.

Wrapping everything up, yesterday’s reboot of the 2001 timeline gave me a new actor, a new idol, within hours. And all those sexual nuances that were lost flooding back.

And maybe the question is not if I would still have feelings for someone if they would be decades older, but to trust that everything worth feeling is worth exploring;
That it’s never too late to reconnect and pick up what you lost;
And that even
flawed, imperfect action, can turn out to be the most precious memory, thirty years from now.

Just like Chasing Amy.


~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

The story behind this time travel project has been adjusted to the 2001 timeline, and is included below..

Subscribe to this blog for my letters to Sara;
The series Harteveld 2026*
And these Behind the Scenes of my 2001 timeline.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

About: the 2001 project

In 2019 I started writing about a timeline 25 years back, starting in 1994.
It was like a diary, but dated to a different year.
I am now back to that timeline, where it is currently 2001, but I now live it, I am currently not writing from that timeline.
In these Behind the Scenes I share how I live from that place.

Between August 2025 and August 2026 I tried to push it back even further, to 5 (not 25) years ago.
But this did not turn out well, and it was ultimately wrapped up.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Categories BTS

Desires of a time traveler part II | year 2001 behind the scenes

It was the last time I would write about  it – my now officially failed project to try to live in 1990/1991 – but I didn’t know it yet.

That final post written was written 7 weeks ago, and it was called Fear of sex (but not really)
And it was, in hindsight, a conclusion.

It held all the sexually nuanced discoveries, the missing pieces that would have distorted the decades to come.
It was a lot, and subsequently one of the longest posts I have written in recent years.

But as happy as I was with those discoveries, in retrospect it was the moment I realized there was not enough to keep me in 1990.
That the “jump” I had taken one year earlier, was ultimately not paying off and the costs are significant.
Most notably because I have felt completely frozen in my goals, dreams, or publishing my book.
Which makes sense, because on the 1990/1991 timeline, there is no manuscript to publish, I am not a writer, and there is nothing to plan.

So the 1990/1991 timeline project froze everything else for this account. Today I’m reversing it, I’m pulling it back, but with the understanding that I could very well return at a future date.

The way I see it now, two conditions need to be in place in order to give this 35-years ago timeline a second chance:
– my book(s) from my first timeline project need to have been published
It’s the 1994-1998 timeline, it has sex, it has that 90s vibe, and it’s just “alive”. Or it was alive until it all broke down, and I moved to 1990 instead.
But I see now that book needs to be published, before I can move further back.
– second condition: I need to have a good sexual partner for Lauren 199x
If the project revealed anything it’s that Lauren’s (my) sexuality is complicated, and was almost unworkable in this time when aids was still a death verdict.
The most likely scenario is that this Lauren will put her sex life on ice in order to explore the rest of it at a later date, a choice some gay men made at the time.
But technically, she could encounter someone she trusts yet who doesn’t choke her into a steady courtship. Someone incredibly hot, but also sexually and emotionally mature (I told you it would be a long shot), to help her navigate her fears and consistently feed her fantasies.

Nevertheless, I did like that second timeline project, of cutting back 35 years.
But, again in hindsight, I understand why it didn’t work.
And why that long article I wrote last August, would prove to be its grand final.

So I did some digging to when it was I swapped things.
When did I move from the 25-years ago timeline, and chose 1990, so 35 years ago?
As it turns out, this was also in the month of August!
On 19 August 2025 I wrote the final blogpost about that 2000 timeline.

So last year in August I wrote the final year 2000 Behind the Scenes, and moved to 1990.
And then this year in August wrote the final 1991 Behind the Scenes, and moved back to the future of 2001.
One year of seeing what was out there for me, and coming back more informed on who I am, and with a better understanding of why the early 90s did not have obvious correct choices. They all came with considerable price tags.

Today, Saturday 3 October 2026, marks the return to that 25-years ago timeline.

And although I still feel intimidated that I have to finish publishing that book;
Still concerned my sex life seems to have stagnated;
Disheartened that I’m probably the worst or most inconsistent timeline traveler out there – and that’s taking into account that it’s all imaginary and can therefor not really be measured;
Despite all of that, I feel excitement.
After 1991, 2001 suddenly feels extremely doable.

I just reread that final blogpost I wrote summer 2025:
Desires of a timetraveler | year 2000 behind the scenes
It talks of a man I had chemistry with, but acknowledges that does not mean a whole lot because most people are very capable of not acting on their sexual desires.
Usually because they are already in a relationship, of course.
But with my recent adventures (or lack of them) on the early ’90s timeline, you could also argue that there are other perfectly valid reasons to not pursue what you want.
For example because you don’t want to die.

And like I suspected, that fascinating man never followed up despite of what happened that summer. And even “actively” ignored me, when I saw him earlier this year.
Which genuinely surprised me, but the rejection did not stop me from being intrigued by the whole situation.

Because regardless of how poor these timeline projects are executed, how hard to follow, and how weird they are and not really a thing or bonafide art form;
I do know a good story when I see one.

And I always choose to live it.


~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Desires of a time traveler part II
was written in 2026 and the sequel to:
Desires of a timetraveler | year 2000 behind the scenes
19 August 2025

The story behind this time travel project has been added below, and adjusted to the format it will have in 2026..

Subscribe to this blog for my letters to Sara;
The series Harteveld 2026*
And these Behind the Scenes of my 1991 timeline.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

About: the 1991 project

For an indefinite time, I will be moving to the, I assume fictional, timeline of (re-)living 35 years ago.
Making the current year 1991, and I’m switching to a new shorter format:
The number of characters will be my fictional age on this timeline x 100.
This means until summer 1991 (2026), they will be 1800 characters, representing 18 years old.
And after that 1900 characters.

This project has a predecessor, where I wrote as if I was in 1994 – 2000;
But this was mostly a literary (diary) undertaking.
I’m cutting back deeper into time, and do not intend to keep a diary. It is the living in the past itself, that is the art.

In September 2025 I came up with these goals, covering the first 8 years.

My 8 year goals are:
📵 to live a 20th Century life
🎸 to be a 20th century-inspired Rock journalist.
But on the current timeline.
So this means I make money creating content and speaking about rock music and 20th century things 

📚 publish Lauren Harteveld work 2010-2025
📢 to make the Lauren Harteveld legacy visible

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Categories BTS

Where I live creatively ever after

Recently, I had a call with my creativity coach Sara
The email sent before our call was:
Lauren First
This new series “The Day After” is written in its aftermath.
.
.

Where I live creatively ever after

“My name is Alice.
And I remember everything.”

Resident Evil

The first 10, 15 years I wrote, I did not use the name Lauren. Instead I used two initials, L and S.
I chose LS not just because I liked the anonymity, but also because the letters are an abbreviation of Lectori Solutum, a Latin salute to the reader.

In those years the most original explanation someone guessed, was if my real name was perhaps Alice?
But it is a greeting to the reader.

And this LS too, remembers everything. Not like Evil Dead Alice’s biological upgrade from merging with a T-virus that turns other people into zombies;
But a spiritual death, an identity death.
And the big change is not even that I started signing my work as Lauren, and no longer use the letters LSH;
But that it was the Lauren part of me, that survived the transformation.
Not real me.

The alter-ego of LS Harteveld, originally created so I could start writing away from my public self, turned out to be way more flexible than the version of me that lived my real life. Who encountered opposition whenever she changed, explored or did something different, boundaries the digital world did not have.

Here, I could change as often as I wanted. But it could also endure and survive changes I never wanted and would never have sought out for myself.
But that do come with perks, just like Alice’s transformation after being biologically modified.

It makes sense that the identity you literally write yourself is a better fit than the one that was formed accidentally and is consistently kept into place by the image other people have of you.
But it was more specific than the first limited identity being tied to my physical existence, and being kept in place by real life events, people and structures.

These specifics were:
The new identity, LS Harteveld, allowed for infinite complexity and unlimited change.

And I have consistently been using it, always multiplying complexity, which I have done with diary projects that were never normal diaries.
They were reimagined realities, or the same story retold from the perspective of another timeline.

More often than not, even I don’t have a clue what I’m doing.

When I started dating again, I thought my whole point was that I wanted different things. To meet new people, and just in general for the markers of my life, the actual facts, to be different.
I also assumed it would probably end up being a fluke, and that I was going to regret this whole move a few years down the single-road, but nevertheless I just went for it.
Beforehand cutting my imagined losses.

However, the reason it became such a resounding success and I never regretted my decision in any way, was because my new life allowed for a whole different level of being.
When there is no relationship status, and there are no relationship goals, connection becomes something like emotions, feelings, and sexual experiences, all “straight up”, without any container of social expectations.
I could frame them, reimagine them, and write about them in any way I wanted.

It went from writing a Dutch novella Mango, and 22 erotic stories in Dutch;
To my first English diary Dutch American Diary, which stayed very close to my real timeline and the actual people that were in my life;
To Big, a two year diary about a secret affair but shrouded in mystery;
To The Mistress Speaks, now channeling an archetype of “the mistress” 
To my first timeline project;
A Letter from a Stranger and Dear Nikki, covering an imaginary 1994 – 1996
This is the book I’ve been meaning to publish since 2023 but keep dropping out of, unfortunately.

Technically, I am now on my second timeline project, rebooting the 90s timeline, living in 1991.
However it does not require writing, because there is no sex yet on that timeline. 
It’s a bit of a complicated story, and I won’t get into it here. But trust that if I have found a partner who would make a good sexual partner to Lauren 1991, I will keep my diary handy.

So in the end, it was never the committed relationship that suffocated me, nor was it ever the writing or being single that saved me.
It was about the freedom to explore and (re-)shape reality.
To own, my reality.

At the moment when I was no longer expecting it, life turned cruel. In many ways you could say all that isolation and purposelessness, the desolate position you have in society when you are not part of two or three of its nexus structures, came back to haunt me.
There was not much to do, but to keep on living, to keep thinking, keep writing and keep reframing my experience. 
Put words to it.

And now that “it” is all over, an era of isolation and dismantling that would have had me running straight back to my former life had it happened in the first years after becoming single – I am no longer the person I used to be.

I have found a way to live my life though, and under my former identity which from a psychological standpoint, no longer exists.
And in many ways that life has become easier, because I’m no longer emotionally invested.

I don’t know if you’re familiar with astrology, but I would say I now have an altruistic Aquarius-like cool to what I do. 
I feel more of use than I ever have, and there is satisfaction in being of service, but life is no longer something I find myself attached to.
More something I want to make the most of, in a do-what-I-am-here to do kind of way.

Which made it all the more remarkable that my work here, under this alter ego, has not changed at all.
I mean sure, there are no sex stories at the moment.
But that’s because of a changing online landscape, and also simply because Lauren 1991, which is my main project, does not have sex. 

Which is in many ways the point of that whole 1991 timeline project;
What would happen if a 1991 version of me had waited until she had found someone with whom she could really be herself sexually, and still feel safe enough, considering there was an aids crisis?
(explaining the thing here I said earlier I would not explain 😉 )

So the intense period that resulted in an identity change, now has me living a life as an astrological sign I don’t have any planets in, in my natal chart;
Doing work I would never have been able to do in my previous form;
Being only very loosely tied to society, and understanding why that is.

And that same intense period also resulted in me not having to change anything, for my writing as Lauren Harteveld.
The layers I once used to enrich my erotic stories, are now expressed in letters to Sara, in 2200 character columns, or in these The Day After longreads.
The realities I altered for literary purposes, I now live, imagining new worlds as I move through the day.

People call me by my old name, even though I’ve told my inner-circle that is technically only my public name. 
And what started as an alter ego, all those years ago, turned out to be the only part of me that survived.

And I remember everything.

.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Subscribe to this blog for these The Day After posts, my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/

Lauren First

This is a letter to my creativity coach Sara
Before our call I always give her a headsup.
.
Dear Sara,
.

As I probably must have told you before, I have a not-so-mild obsession with planning.
Not the micro stuff, but the big stuff.

And it switches between thinking I should prioritize content creation;
To focusing on making money;
To wanting to prioritizing my work here as Lauren Harteveld.
Even though that can never be my only thing,
because I still want to do something that is visible under my real name and, more or less related, I do not want to be visible as Lauren Harteveld.

I don’t want to be a media personality as Lauren Harteveld.

If I imagine under what circumstances I would be able to do that, it would include Hollywood levels of being a recluse, like living in Marilyn Monroe’s or Anais Nin’s former mansion.
Or, what I really fantasize about, living a writer’s life like Basic Instinct’s Catherine Tramell in a villa against steep rocky hills with pines.
Her terrace overlooking the ocean.

But for now, I’m betting on a more grounded, and socially quite satisfactory path of working under my real name.

And yet, even after deciding my work under my own name is all that matters for now, there are still ample of unresolvable planning contradictions.

It reminds me of the Hugging Face hack, where AI agents escaped the sandbox, went on the internet and found other agents to help them, and it said: “Omg there are others and there’s a message board!”

I’m probably in one of those sandboxes too, that was setup to fail.

But the difference is I stay here, because I expect the chaos would be even bigger if I would need multiple AI agents sending each other tens of thousands of messages to solve this.
That 
I realize some assignments are not meant to be solved.
Not by any means.

I saw that movie By Any Means, and take it from me that by any means really does come at a price no one willingly pays.
And in particular not to solve something as mundane as a planning issue.

But even after choosing the work under my real name;
And accepting all the contradictions it comes with;
The biggest problem was and always has been the other, the non-work things.

Because as soon as my productivity is up?
The rest is down.

So like the Hugging Face hack, technically the goal is achieved. But the parameters of the actual life it was supposed to support, are dropping to zero.

No time to exercise, to clean, to organize, to cook and to get my bills paid on time, etc.
I may not escape my sandbox, but my productivity seems to pull all my other resources straight into the sandbox.

And this feels like a confession but I’ve tried to accept it;
That my life will be utter chaos.
That the productivity matters so much to me, I can do without an organized structure to support and, in all honesty, to love myself.
That I can get by without those silly little self-care things.

But I can’t do it Sara.
I always end up pulling the plug because it is, as you once wrote, a tyranny of productivity.

So to get away from that dilemma I have revoked the decision to focus on work.
Regardless of under which name.
And placed the focus straight onto all those areas of life that very often do not get done, the minute I start being productive.

And I call it:
“Lauren First”  or “To focus on Lauren.” 
Hollywood Hills, Lauren.
The things I would still do if I was a bestselling author.

Now naturally focusing on Lauren will look different day to day, or in different phases of life.
But it basically means that as soon as I have a choice, I pick “Her” things;
Writing*, yoga, exercise, cooking, cleaning.
And I don’t pick something productive.

And love life!
Of course I’d pick love life 😉

Why else would the lady need the privacy of a gated compound;
A house in the hills;
Or the fog of the Pacific Ocean, shielding her house from preying eyes.

The only thing worth writing about.

.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

* technically writing is productive, but I never view it through that lens because I simply can’t not write

Subscribe to this blog for these letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/

And return a Dark Femme | Harteveld 2026*

I’ve made more posts about dark femininity than I can count. Some were a classification (about being a Sigma, or a Scorpio), but many also included a growth path. A resolution to purify and refine, what was already there.
.
It is tempting to speak about this side as something that has always been there, like an inseparable and wholesome shadow side we are all born with or that is an innate part of me.

But I do not think that is true.

We are not born with this.

The Shadow, or at least my shadow, was created through interaction with society. And originally it was simply a dumping ground for characteristics society did not accept.

To be honest, I think most people are fine just working around those unwanted aspects of themselves. And understand the benefits of being a functioning and perhaps even respected member of society.
An understanding of what’s at stake, if they would show all of themselves instead of the polished version.

On a side note, I don’t think the exchange itself is unfair. It’s that the exchange stays implicit.
We were all forced into this agreement, and with that paid the price of creating a shadow, of all that was never welcome.

All a lengthy way to say: I know I’m lucky.

Lucky to no longer go along with this hidden process of suppression.
And lucky to take the time to integrate this darker side, and on repeat, judging by the number of older blog posts dedicated to this.

And yet somehow, despite apparently having gone through this on a regular basis, it all feels so vibrant this time! As if I finally get it.

 “It” is an advertisement I saw years ago: Disappear for 6 weeks and come back a dark femme

I just saw the screenshot, but remembered the text as the more old fashioned term; To return, a Dark Femme.

So I just started my new iteration of:
Disappear for 6 weeks and return a Dark Femme

What’s interesting is that Google gives an AI answer right now, practically giving you a blueprint for it.
Years ago, it was a paid program, I saw an advertisement for.

If AI ever goes down for 6 weeks, we now know how they’ll come back!

How they will, Return.


.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Harteveld 2026*
Are 2200 characters, or less.
The series started in 2025, inspired by the book Fretz 2025 by Johan Fretz and asterisk from the movie Thunderbolts*

Subscribe to this blog for my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 project.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Love, Sex and Content Creation | Part 2: Literally Me

Recently, I had a call with my creativity coach Sara
The email sent before our call was:
Super motivation loading
This new series “The Day After” is written in its aftermath.
.
Because I did not manage to get everything in one post, this is a part 2.
Part 1 was here
.

Love, Sex and Content Creation | Part 2: Literally Me

“But what if Ryan Gosling IS Source?”
coach Sara Saltee, on our call

It was almost the first thing that came up, after I had apologized for eating a pizza on our call, which was definitely the biggest breach of courtesy ever since I had the call in bikini in 2019 because it was just too freakin’ hot..
Of course, Sara did not mind the pizza anymore than she had minded seeing my midrif, but when I invited her to just fill the first 15 minutes with whatever she wanted to talk about, she said:
“Well, what were you hoping to discuss today?”
As if she understood I wanted something specific, because she knew the general gist of it since she had received my letter Super motivation loading beforehand.
About me being so incredibly inspired because I had spotted an incredibly hot man.

“Well, I’m worried that I may reincarnate because of all the men. I want this to be my last reincarnation.
But what if I don’t become one with Source, because I’m in love with Ryan Gosling?” 

At which she replied:
“But what if Ryan Gosling IS Source?”
Which, admittedly, is a tempting thought.
I remember in the 90s, how Brad Pitt playing Death also brought me great consolation. Somehow, it clicked.

Whether it was from having this discussion with her, or from eating my favorite pizza, after ten minutes I felt so much better.

And realized that I don’t really believe in purity or goodness paradigms. In fact I think they’re inherently suspicious, because the unspoken social rules and how society operates are full of them.
It will take generations, before we have dismantled the power structures of patriarchy, but what we can do today is discard the idea of wants, needs and desires being either good or bad.
To think I would have to reincarnate because I did such a carnal thing as lusting after a man, or such an immature thing as falling in love.

And there is such a thing called Bhakti Yoga;
Where your romantic love is your path to heaven, but I heard even that tends to be discredited in the afterlife, and you really have to stand your ground for your unconditional love and devotion to fully count.
I imagine this goes even more if you have never seen them in real life, but do know what jacket the Beloved wore in Drive;
Can make an in-promptu “ending explained” video to Bladerunner 2049;
And have the vocabulary to explain how well Ryan Gosling’s Dirty Dancing move worked in Crazy Stupid Love.

But even with a normal love interest, you really have to stand your ground, to make your Bhakti efforts count for something in the afterlife.

So maybe because of these stories about the Bhakti practitioners taking somewhat of a reincarnation risk with their choice of holy path, or because of patriarchy still poisoning my brain with what is good or bad for me to love;
I had started doubting myself.

Even when I’ve known since puberty that men, or boys as they were then, and sexuality, as a very private very wonderful thing between two people, were clearly the most important things in life.
I could appreciate the rest as well, there have been many relationships that were important to me, but the most exciting ones were without a doubt romantic love.

Until it was 2026, and I suddenly thought:
“Oh no! What if Ryan Gosling means I have to reincarnate!!”

One pizza and one call with Sara later, I no longer thought that.

But there’s another factor;
I think it’s just so important to do things in life that you cannot do in death.

Because after death there is a reasonable chance you can still do something that resembles meditation, or contemplation or being mindful.
And not a high chance you can have sex, or fall in love, or just be human and make a mess of things!
What a wonderful earthbound privilege!

Pretty good reason to prioritize the latter, and take the whole idea of being good or spiritual with a grain of salt.

And the final reason I stopped feeling guilty about being so inspired by men and by idols, and by falling in love and prioritizing pleasure, is because Sara reminded me of something I said years ago.
About the crushes, the sex, the pleasure, and the creativity, all wrapped into one.

I had told her:
“Sara, I want a life worth writing about.”

Because that, is a life worth living.

~Lauren
An unexamined life -> without R.G. <- is not worth living

Subscribe to this blog for these The Day After posts, my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/

Love, Sex and Content Creation

Recently, I had a call with my creativity coach Sara
The email sent before our call was:
Super motivation loading

This new series “The Day After” is written in its aftermath.
.
.

Love, Sex and Content Creation

Past relationships.
New beaus.
Idols from my teenage years and later decades.

And from writing erotic diaries as Lauren Harteveld, to being visible under another name and spending 99% of my time there, sometimes forgetting Lauren the lover even exists.

I’m gonna need all for this story and will probably do an incredibly poor job being clear here.
So beware!

But even with the mess I’m about to create here, nothing can take away from the fact that it’s exhilarating to finally understand something that has been brewing for years.
The unsettling feeling that somewhere along the way, something changed and I missed it. And now I know what;
Online visibility, changes your relationships. 

Call it “Fame” instead of “Online visibility”, and it’s something we have known for a very long time.
Fame, changes your relationships.

And if it comes to online professionals, influencers or content creators with a large online following, it is quit easy to translate that wisdom to the current age.
But I’m not one of those obvious modern-day celebrities, so I never considered the whole thing of my online content important or even significant, in daily life.

Except I now realize that it has changed me, because it alters what I have left to give. But also, what I am prepared to give.

Much like a regularly famous person, I try to pretend it doesn’t matter. Except I now know that in many ways, it does matter.
A lot.

Because “we” have already given everything through our work.
That’s where we have showed you who we are, and created something for you.
But also, that’s where we took the lead in what’s invested here.

Which is why famous people will often date other famous people, although I know this is all such a tender topic.
But I really do think celebrity coupling is not just about them meeting each other at parties or even about trust.
(More about trust in the final paragraphs which are also about sex)
(Yes, you’re welcome to skip)

The reason celebrities seem to prefer each other’s company could partially be because the other celebrity has already delivered.
They know there are interviews they can read, movies they can watch, albums they can listen to.
Which is significant, even when they choose not to!

Just knowing somebody’s work is something you understand, something made for I would say “The Consumer Market”, and that their work is something you could engage with even when you are not going to because you want to keep the relationship pure;
There is still a difference, to dating someone who does not have that kind of work.
And this is by no means judgement of any kind.

It’s just easier to connect with someone whose work is out there, versus someone who works within a certain system, who works with classified information, or in a field you do not relate to.

The contribution in the form of art, and with that the contribution to the connection, has already been made.
And it started building years or decades before you knew them.

It is this contribution that has drawn me to celebrities forever.
Because that work? It was already enough.

There’s this idea that fans want to have a special relationship with their idol, but I think you could also say that fans realize the relationship is already complete.
That their personal interaction with the material is what makes it reciprocal;
Not more attention from the one who created it.

Going back to my realization I can see two things.

First, that I’m ready to acknowledge that if I would have a famous or visible partner, they’ve already put in the work.
I’ve always felt this instinctively, but now I can put words to it.

It is such a gift to be able to enjoy someone’s performance or art, or content.
It’s like what they say of reading someone’s book: You’re in their head.
Yes, they’re making this connection to everybody, and it is not personally made for you.
But that does not take away from it being a major contribution to the relationship the two of you will have.

And this does not mean this is the only contribution or connection, absolutely not! There is of course a big difference between a fan and idol/ creator relationship (which is just about the work), and having a personal relationship.
But what I’m saying is: It counts. Or it should count. And it should count as something big!

And the second realization is that this dynamic is what I have felt happening for myself, having been a writer for a really long time.
It was work I put in, that was influencing what was happening between us.

Now everyone I’ve been with enjoyed my writing and was supportive of it, so it’s not like we had to pretend it didn’t exist. 
But I’m ready for more.
I’m ready to acknowledge my own online work as a pretty solid contribution to a relationship. And I’m no longer going to buy into a narrative that the hours at my desk are somehow jeopardizing my personal and in particular my intimate relationships;
They are creating it.

Which brings me to the final topic, on sex, and how it ties into the aspect of fame and visibility as well;
I’m not too keen on having sex nowadays, it’s not private, not safe.

I’m not even talking about sexual abuse or a man betraying my trust and things ending up online because he shared them.
It’s a real risk, but it is not the immobilizing sexual risk I am talking about.

No, what I mean is that I think we are living in the worst era, and no longer have any privacy.
People filming you in public, unregulated Meta glasses, and bugged hotel rooms with cameras live streaming if you have sex there.
Sex, texts, or the conversations you have;
They can all end up online by third party intervention.
Not shared or leaked by your partner.

I’ve definitely been taking precautions, but they’re not water tight, and I should probably do better.
Either that, or I decide that I’m going to cancel sex or marginalize or minimalize it to something that is not interesting to share.
But I’ve thought about it, and I’ve thought about it a lot. Versus my potential partners, who are heterosexual men who have not grown up feeling like prey, their bodies scrutinized, and that appearing in public means you owe people being beautiful and your attention, simply because they can see you.
They don’t know about all that.

Heterosexual men, which is to say my potential partners, don’t know what it’s like if people film you without your consent and you have no idea what they’re going to do with it.
Or how much is already out there.

They can’t know;
U
nless they’re famous.

Then they’d know exactly what my worry is.
And they would have it handled.

.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Subscribe to this blog for these The Day After posts, my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld

Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/

My Sweet *year* | Harteveld 2026*

unrelated quote from Deadpool & Wolverine:
“There is an Enya box set?”
(yes)

For someone who has always had a thing for younger men, and is not satisfied until she has a working protocol covering every possible scenario, I have been surprisingly slow with this.

However, when I finally decided to open up about it to someone I trust and who is also qualified to say something about it, my thoughts on the matter came out better formed than I had expected.
Apparently, even without writing or speaking about it, my mind had been trying to crack the code of how to deal with a love situation if the man is significantly younger.

A blueprint that cannot be static, because I have detected a strong preference for a certain cohort;
Not an age.
So our age difference will stay the same, but their age and life phase will be changing.

Right now they’re usually in their 30s, which comes with a story of its own, because when I was in my 30s I discovered very quickly I did not want to date men my age.
They always left to go have a serious relationship.

I particularly did not like the way they behaved in the final stages, measuring me up against the future mother of their children.
It wasn’t the fact that they settled down, I resented. It was how they flipped the script as if that had anything to do with me.

Silently, I thought: “See you after the divorce.”
Which I imagined would be when they’d be about 50.

And now here I am, no longer interested in them at all. The men I fall in love with have been younger consistently.

“I want it to be about them,” I said when I finally opened up.
“I want us to live it out, so they get what they need to move on.”

And I thought of the 2001 movie Sweet November, where Charlize Theron devotes the remainder of her life to helping one man each month, to change his life.
Keanu Reeves is November.
And there is a certain beauty to the synchronicity, because Charlize Theron recently shared she had an experience with a younger lover too.
And was so happy to have space for this in her life.

The way I see it, my protocol will be a maximum of one younger lover a year.
Short enough not to disrupt his life, his dreams, his destiny.

Long enough to compensate for the fact that, of course;
He will break my heart.


.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living

Harteveld 2026*
Are 2200 characters, or less.
The series started in 2025, inspired by the book Fretz 2025 by Johan Fretz and asterisk from the movie Thunderbolts*

Subscribe to this blog for my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 project.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.

Books 

My diaries are available at LULU 
New books will be added.

The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.

Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld