Recently, I had a call with my creativity coach SaraThe email sent before our call was:
Men. Yoga. Writing.
This new series “The Day After” is written in its aftermath.
New Foundation
Even 35 years after the date – as 1991 is the year I am now in, conducting my back-in-time timeline experiment – I feel guilty positioning myself between gay men.
Men whose sex life was physically dangerous because of the aids crisis.
And whose sexuality at large was socially dangerous because society’s newly acquired “acceptance” of homosexuality had proven to be little more than veneer.
Although I do credit The Netherlands for not letting the gay community down and refusing to frame aids as a gay disease.
Someday I will probably have to be more nuanced and explain how pretending we were all at equal risk came at a cost of turning back sexual emancipation across the board.
And teenage girls in particular were barked back into the barn of patriarchy.
But ultimately, as my coach Sara pointed out when I said that in both pandemics, of 80s aids as well as the Covid pandemic, The Netherlands had been pretty specific with regard to the choices the government had made, ultimately human nature is the same everywhere.
Dehumanization of homosexual aids patients on one continent is rooted in the same deeper discomfort with sex as a whole, as that of a 1991 Lauren betraying her true sexual nature on the other side of the globe, because she knew that was the only way to stay connected to everyone she knew.
She stayed, in her way, in the closet.
So what can I say about this shift in my life, without already becoming disheartened by all the layers there are to this?
Is there an elevator pitch to this?
Probably not.
There’s no such thing as an elevator pitch to something that is both an artistic experiment (pretend-living in 1991) as well as what I would label sexual activism.
But the new direction my life is taking, and the new direction also of the 1991 timeline project, is that I will redo my life from 1991 up, from the stance of:
“What would have happened if I had stayed sexually true to myself?”
Now there are multiple options here, of course.
Maybe Lauren 1991 will make the same choice real-me made back then, and have a monogamous relationship with safe sex. The in-the-closet option, that kept social and medical disturbances at a minimum.
Maybe she’ll repeat what I already wrote about in an earlier timeline project, which was have an affair with Bear, who had other lovers while she was seeing him.
That type of affair never happened to me when I lived through the 90s.
But it did feel redeeming to give to myself that, in my first timeline project, which ran from 2019 (1994) to 2023-ish.
Or maybe “she”, Lauren 1991 in this second timeline project, will honor the fact that I never valued my partner being monogamous, and was really only invested in the sexual part of the relationship.
And had a love for gay men, bisexual men, and for adventures that were unforeseen and just went with the flow.
But what I want to highlight is a third option, one 1991 Lauren never knew she had and that to the untrained eye may look like America’s revival and re-instalment of promoting not having sex before marriage;
Yet that is actual a celibacy of an entirely different nature!
Which is abstinence because it is too dangerous, too risky, to have sex when there is no treatment yet. But with the understanding that your sexuality is still yours, is still honored, is still in its true form, just not practiced.
I think it was about 2015, when I read about that third option. An openly gay man told about how he had refrained from sex when there was no treatment. If I remember correctly he was about my age, so he had basically been halted in his tracks.
He never had a “carefree” time, quotation marks because the virus was already being spread before the first infections were registered.
He gave this interview looking back, and said it had been an incredibly difficult choice to make at the time, but he did not regret it.
That was when I thought: “Wow! That is so cool! I could have done that!”
Honoring both my fear as well as my true sexual nature in the late 80s, early 90s, would have meant to say, just like that gay man;
“This (-) is my sexuality. But I am currently not practicing because it’s too dangerous.”
That’s not making abstinence morally better, and it’s not piggy-backing on religious values. That’s owning your sexuality, and also making a choice that aligns with the circumstances.
I have so much more to say about how it was ultimately the 2020-2022 pandemic and radically falling out of love with society and losing all sense of belonging, that brought me back to the underlying dynamics of my difficult sexuality, a trajectory that I thought I had already corrected.
And a long time ago.
I had no idea I was still carrying “stuff” from that trauma of feeling so pressured to limit myself sexually, still things I had not put to words and did not fully understand.
This blog has dozens of articles of me deciphering the societal dynamics of the 2020 pandemic, when it was actually also me deciphering something that had happened in the 20th century.
And yes, there are also articles where I link this to the aids crisis, definitely.
And yet my current stance, and rekindled 1991 experiment, is different.
The talk I had with Sara locked in a new direction for my life and my work as a writer. And for that timeline project of being in 1991 and saying No to the easy solution of fitting in via a heterosexual monogamous relationship.
And saying Yes, to being different.
It’s about experimenting with accepting the social fallout in 1991, instead of seeing it implode in 2020.
It is about daring to see society exactly for what it is, and allowing deep isolation to happen before you’re 20 years old.
It’s about choosing truth over comfort.
A sexual truth.
One that was a long time coming.
.
~Lauren
An unexamined life is not worth living
Subscribe to this blog for these The Day After posts, my letters to Sara, the series Harteveld 2026* and the Behind the Scenes of my year 1991 diary.
The subscription button is on this page, most likely on the top right.
Books
My diaries are available at LULU
New books will be added.
The best way to receive updates on when these books are ready,
is to subscribe to this blog.
Button on this page, probably on the top right.
Or follow my Facebook page
/ Twitter: @LSHarteveld
Nederlands blog:
https://zegmaarlauren.com/
This is a letter to
Years? Decades? Last weekend I had the first weekend without doing any work in any way. I wrote a blogpost, but writing blogposts is basically as leisurely as it gets around here, so that does not count.
Rage.
Recently, I had a call with
This is a letter to
I have no idea if this is a disappointment or a relief, but this timeline experiment seems to be leading to redoing everything I thought I regretted.
It happened when I had my own place again. And depending on how you count, you could say it was actually the very first time that I had my own place.
Recently, I had a call with